By Staughton Lynd
Note: This is Essay 7 in the series I have been
writing on “Re-Examining Lucasville.”
Two persons, one an experienced journalist and the other a prisoner at
Lucasville in April 1993, have said the same thing. They believe the main idea that should tie
our thoughts together is: THEY DON’T
KNOW WHO DID IT!
That is,
five men have been sentenced to death for murdering ten victims during the
occupation of L-block, but the authorities (the State of Ohio, the Lucasville
Special Prosecutor, the several Assistant Prosecutors, and the Ohio State
Highway Patrol) do not know who actually committed the homicides.
Instead,
the authorities have gone after the men who they believe were “leaders” of the
eleven-day occupation of L-block. They
have been able to get away with their claims because of the Ohio doctrine of
“complicity,” which allows courts to sentence people to death if they were
present at the scene of criminal conduct or were otherwise involved.
It was the prosecution’s burden to
convince juries, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Five should be found
guilty of the murders that took place during the rebellion. Much has been said about the homicides in
previous essays. Essays still to come
will examine in very great detail how I believe the State constructed a false
explanation of the murder that most concerned the public: the murder of hostage officer Robert
Vallandingham. For now, I shall gather
scattered references to the several homicides from the different essays, and
show that the State either did not know who did the killings, or knew, but
needed the actual killer as a witness and so blamed someone else.